Molecular Visualizations of DNA



Uploaded by: Tristimulus99
Video Description:
Amazing CGI visualization of molecular biology's central dogma. It shows animations of DNA coiling, replication, transcription and translation.
It was created by Drew Berry of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb



Tags for this video: animation central dna dogma

Περισσότερα videos απο την κατηγορια: Tech
Αλλα Videos απο τον χρηστη: Tristimulus99

Related Videos
Spontaneous DNA, The Rapture, and The Rise to Fourth Density Transcription and Translation HIV Replication 3D Medical Animation
spontaneous-dna-the-rapture-and-the-rise-to-fourth-density.htmlspontaneous-dna-the-rapture-and-the-rise-to-fourth-density.htmlspontaneous-dna-the-rapture-and-the-rise-to-fourth-density.html
DNA Replication Process How Big is Your Genome? Strange DNA dna
spontaneous-dna-the-rapture-and-the-rise-to-fourth-density.htmlspontaneous-dna-the-rapture-and-the-rise-to-fourth-density.htmlspontaneous-dna-the-rapture-and-the-rise-to-fourth-density.html


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
well then, have fun ... ( 2 weeks ago by beelzeboss1993)
well then, have fun in hell
hey dibbuck. ... ( 2 weeks ago by illgodownswingin)
hey dibbuck. Nihilism is a waste of time.
That's quite funny. ... ( 2 weeks ago by dibbuck)
That's quite funny. It's ok, nihilism isn't really my bag, I was just lampooning the zeitgeist.
... ( 2 weeks ago by ZgrillujeCiMame)
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT MAAN
It's just like what ... ( 1 week ago by lepivert)
It's just like what my phone line does...
or... shiiiiit ... ( 1 week ago by lepivert)
or... shiiiiit womaaan
Funny that no one ... ( 1 week ago by Harzburgitic)
Funny that no one seems to realise that this is a theory as well. Never asked yourself why you've never seen a picture or video of a real molecule, electron, or atom? I can prove from this video alone that a creator for all material existence is the most logical and plausible theory based on science. Ask yourself. Why do you accept dna as evidence in paternity and criminal cases, then we can talk about a creator.
Cute video. ( 1 week ago by ViralVideo21)
Cute video.
Imagine this... ... ( 1 week ago by dfortae)
Imagine this... Suppose you were to land on a planet that human beings have never visited. Imagine finding a pocket watch sitting on the surface. Would you think that occurred naturally on the planet? Of course not.
Now, imagine comparing the complexity of the pocket watch to DNA. DNA replication and transcription is millions of times more complicated, sophisticated, and sensitive. The key is to spot the traits of intelligence. DNA has intelligence signs far greater than humans.
You have no chance ... ( 1 week ago by Kaliahn)
You have no chance in finding a pocket watch on another planet (except if someone threw it there) But if the conditions are ok, you can find a living organism. DNA is not intelligent, each molecule of part of the molecule does always the same thing, stick to the same molecule and so on. It's like an NPC in a game... it does always the same things but has no true intelligence... Then of course, it depends on every body beliefs... but I say, no one should be misled by the complexity of life.
dfortae, 1. A ... ( 1 week ago by mad27)
dfortae, 1. A pocketwatch is not comparable to DNA, or any living organism. Though it may function in complex ways, its components are all rather simple. It's not too much of a stretch to say that the metal for the watch can be found, but then again, watches don't evolve. 2. You assume that the watch needs to be put together, just like DNA must already be in its present form. Todays structures are quite advanced, but they evolved from simpler, less complex origins.
also, pocket ... ( 1 week ago by Veserek)
also, pocket watches usually have manufacturers you can contact in non ambiguous ways
Omni-Timex - the ... ( 1 week ago by iljonathan777)
Omni-Timex - the transdimensional pocket watch that mysteriously appears on planets millions of light years away. Baffling the hell out of the anthropoid civilisations that rise in later epochs and try to work out where on earth (or not) it came from.
go smoke a joint ... ( 1 week ago by ZgrillujeCiMame)
go smoke a joint and then watch this, awesomeee
anglo-saxons true ... ( 1 week ago by Veserek)
anglo-saxons true belief = Heathenry, go find out about odin, he sacrificied himself to himself too, hung on a tree.
world serpent = J
örmungandr or Ouroboros magic runes used in battle or to manifest ones desires. vikings are cooler then any middle easterner.
If DNA points to a ... ( 6 days ago by ultradevon04)
If DNA points to a creator, then there is steal no way you can know anything about that creator. It can be anything from a natural mechanism , the flying spaghetti monster or even Zeus. Making the assumption that it is created doesnt really get you anywhere. That would just make you a deist. And being a deist is pretty much being an atheist. If you want to say its a particular god then you need evidence for that.
Exactly, we should ... ( 6 days ago by Harzburgitic)
Exactly, we should not be trying to describe the creator except through attributes, such as, "creator" "provider" etc. Trying to describe the creator with a man "jesus" or spaghetti or zeus etc. really is pointless. Now if you don't believe that that creator speaks to us "inspires" us thats a different story. and actually coming to a conclusion that we are created gets us to understand "purpose" so it does get us somewhere. Without purpose, there is no purpose
It is so clear. But ... ( 6 days ago by Harzburgitic)
It is so clear. But i have come to believe that recognising the creator is an evolved and higher state of awareness than just eating and drinking like a fly. G-d is always speaking to us i made a video entitled "language" check it out
hmmm interesting, I ... ( 6 days ago by ultradevon04)
hmmm interesting, I definitely dont think the creator thing speaks to us or inspires us in any kind of way because I see no reliable evidence for it. There for if the creator thing is there and has nothing to do with us, how are we to derive some type of purpose in anything. We are simply here and have no idea why. Im cool with not knowing though : D
Array ( 4 days ago by dfortae)
mad27,
You're right about a pocket watch not being comparable to DNA. It is very simple. Yet one will never find one on a planet naturally even though all its components are comprised of atoms of this same universe. Why won't it be found naturally? Because the complexity and arrangement of the molecu
les, atoms, etc. The iron atoms (and heavier elements) are produced inside stars. No one would say it's possible to randomly get things just right to form a watch. How come DNA???
Array ( 4 days ago by dfortae)
ultradevon04,
You are correct. The creator doesn't have to be God or a divine entity. It could have been some other life form that itself is much simpler in atom structure than us. Or, there could be hundreds of generations of "intelligent" creatures that created other intelligent creatures (of simpler forms
) that eventually resulted in us being created. But to say that DNA (again, the original combinations that allow copying) was created randomly by chance is absurd in my opinion.
It took 3 billion ... ( 4 days ago by G0dmaster)
It took 3 billion years for a single cell to evolve. You can't comprehend the vast amount of time that is. Once something even very simple spontaneously does something that makes it advantageous, it will outdo the surrounding things. Just because you can't comprehend it, doesn't mean it can't happen.
So prove it. You ... ( 2 days ago by CFDO1)
So prove it. You raise a good point; one should realise that this is a theory of DNA. Given that it's not possible to prove that this is actually happening inside us (due to the limits of current technology) it shouldn't be blindly accepted. Thankfully however that's not the way science works. Scientific communities, regardless of the discipline, actively try to disprove each other's theories.
Array ( 1 day ago by dfortae)
G0dmaster,
Actually, it didn't take 3 billion years for the cell to evolve. It all had to happen at once in a single blast of lightning or some other mechanism by Darwin's theory of evolution. It's not like it GRADUALLY came about. It happened all of the sudden by random chance. That's why it's not possi
ble.




URL 
Embed Code 


 

 

Discover YouTube videos and enter the world of movie entertainment. Every clip you want and every movie you can imagine is here! Download youtube videos FREE in the blink of an eye!
Entertainment Video, Online Comedy, Funny Vidios are some of our categories! Head for the main course, Cartoon Network Video, Video Comic and People videos. You think that these are for kids? Well take more: Music Clips, Animation Videos, Music Videos and Film Videos. You can even find News Videos. All are here waiting for you to decide and start watching and downloading.
You wanna know what's new? Go for the Most Recent and the New Movies. If you like to play it safe, the Top Rated and Top Favorites won't let you down. Some people just can�t help it: gossip spices up everyday life. Hit the Most Discussed and knock yourselves out. You want more? Search and DOWNLOAD FREE ALL YouTube videos FASTER THAN YOU TUBE!!! We even include special categories, such as, Blogs Videos and 3gp Videos. The animal lovers will enjoy the Animals Videos. The best funny animal videos, cute moments of your pets and the animal kingdom. We did not forget the car addicts, check Autos Videos.